Source strings

756 Strings
100%
Browse Translate
14,042 Words
100%
88,015 Characters
100%
This translation is being used as source strings within this component.

Strings status

Strings Words Characters
756 14,042 88,015
All strings Browse Translate Zen
756 14,042 88,015
Read-only strings Browse Translate Zen

Summary

Project website risksacademy.com
Translation process
  • Translations can only be done through suggestions.
  • Suggestions are automatically accepted as translations once they have 3 votes.
  • Any authenticated user can contribute.
  • The translation uses monolingual files.
  • The translation base language can not be edited.

Reviews are disabled for this language. Review setting: Project settings.

Translations marked as needing editing are not written to the translation file.

Learn how to customize the workflow for this language.

Source code repository local:
Repository branch main
NXS Translate repository https://translate.risksacademy.com/git/academy-courses/course-cyber-risk-foundations/
File mask *.json
Monolingual base language file en.json
Translation file Download en.json
Last change Nov. 6, 2026, 2:43 a.m.
Last change made by NXS Translate import
Language English
Language code en
Text direction Left to right
Case sensitivity Case-sensitive
Number of speakers 1,728,473,503
Number of plurals 2
Plural type One/other
Plurals Singular 1
Plural 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, …
Plural formula n != 1
11/06/2026

String statistics

Strings percent Hosted strings Words percent Hosted words Characters percent Hosted characters
Total 756 14,042 88,015
Translated 100% 756 100% 14,042 100% 88,015
Needs editing 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Read-only 100% 756 100% 14,042 100% 88,015
Failing checks 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Strings with suggestions 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Untranslated strings 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Last 12 months Previous

Activity in last 12 months

0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes
NovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Quick numbers

14,042
Hosted words
756
Hosted strings
100%
Translated
0
Contributors
and previous 30 days

Trends of last 30 days

+100%
Hosted words
—
+100%
Hosted strings
—
+100%
Translated
—
—
Contributors
—
nexus:import System

String added
Excellent (14 to 15): the pack links entity, sector and cross-sector views in the Nexus-Based Risk Management (NRM) sense, names who owns shared links, states residual risk and a review cycle, labels all evidence, leaves out sensitive detail and is clearly written without overclaiming. Good (11 to 13): systems view present with some limits unstated. Developing (7 to 10): systems view mentioned in passing; structure uneven. Insufficient (0 to 6): no systems view, or writing too unclear to act on.
Excellent (14 to 15): the pack links entity, sector and cross-sector views in the Nexus-Based Risk Management (NRM) sense, names who owns shared links, states residual risk and a review cycle, labels all evidence, leaves out sensitive detail and is clearly written without overclaiming. Good (11 to 13): systems view present with some limits unstated. Developing (7 to 10): systems view mentioned in passing; structure uneven. Insufficient (0 to 6): no systems view, or writing too unclear to act on.
excellent-14-to-15-the-pack-links-entity-sector--2f20a5da54
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Nexus view, residual risk and quality of writing
Nexus view, residual risk and quality of writing
nexus-view-residual-risk-and-quality-of-writing-910ce2438e
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Excellent (14 to 15): a register of at least five providers traced from critical services, money and access; tier scores with reasons; fourth parties where known; a correct concentration check. Good (11 to 13): sound register with one element thin, such as fourth parties or the concentration check. Developing (7 to 10): providers listed without tiers or without links to critical services. Insufficient (0 to 6): no dependency analysis.
Excellent (14 to 15): a register of at least five providers traced from critical services, money and access; tier scores with reasons; fourth parties where known; a correct concentration check. Good (11 to 13): sound register with one element thin, such as fourth parties or the concentration check. Developing (7 to 10): providers listed without tiers or without links to critical services. Insufficient (0 to 6): no dependency analysis.
excellent-14-to-15-a-register-of-at-least-five-p-efed3e0246
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Third-party dependencies
Third-party dependencies
third-party-dependencies-67bfe005c4
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Excellent (14 to 15): recovery objectives for critical systems with test status; a correct recovery time check with working; treatments have owners, costs and timing. Good (11 to 13): executable with minor gaps, such as untested objectives or missing costs. Developing (7 to 10): recovery and treatment stated in general terms only. Insufficient (0 to 6): no recovery or treatment content.
Excellent (14 to 15): recovery objectives for critical systems with test status; a correct recovery time check with working; treatments have owners, costs and timing. Good (11 to 13): executable with minor gaps, such as untested objectives or missing costs. Developing (7 to 10): recovery and treatment stated in general terms only. Insufficient (0 to 6): no recovery or treatment content.
excellent-14-to-15-recovery-objectives-for-criti-b8592fbc96
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Response, recovery and executability
Response, recovery and executability
response-recovery-and-executability-dee5156b77
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Excellent (14 to 15): current and target ratings for all six functions with evidence; key controls for each scenario with their state; the link between gaps and scenarios is explained. Good (11 to 13): ratings and controls present with some evidence missing. Developing (7 to 10): functions named but ratings unsupported or controls generic. Insufficient (0 to 6): no programme view.
Excellent (14 to 15): current and target ratings for all six functions with evidence; key controls for each scenario with their state; the link between gaps and scenarios is explained. Good (11 to 13): ratings and controls present with some evidence missing. Developing (7 to 10): functions named but ratings unsupported or controls generic. Insufficient (0 to 6): no programme view.
excellent-14-to-15-current-and-target-ratings-fo-68a40b5c6a
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Programme view and controls
Programme view and controls
programme-view-and-controls-564db279d7
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Excellent (22 to 25): three scenarios from different families, each with all five parts; frequencies anchored on a base rate with written adjustments; impact ranges built up across categories; mean, expected annual loss and bad case level correct with working and labelled inputs. Good (17 to 21): sound scenarios and arithmetic with one element thin, such as the base rate or one impact category. Developing (11 to 16): scenarios incomplete, single-point estimates or calculation errors. Insufficient (0 to 10): no usable scenarios or no estimates.
Excellent (22 to 25): three scenarios from different families, each with all five parts; frequencies anchored on a base rate with written adjustments; impact ranges built up across categories; mean, expected annual loss and bad case level correct with working and labelled inputs. Good (17 to 21): sound scenarios and arithmetic with one element thin, such as the base rate or one impact category. Developing (11 to 16): scenarios incomplete, single-point estimates or calculation errors. Insufficient (0 to 10): no usable scenarios or no estimates.
excellent-22-to-25-three-scenarios-from-differen-d5d6cc851d
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Scenarios with impact and likelihood reasoning
Scenarios with impact and likelihood reasoning
scenarios-with-impact-and-likelihood-reasoning-d64a36bc7b
11/06/2026
Browse all translation changes