Source strings

995 Strings
100%
Browse Translate
20,989 Words
100%
127,780 Characters
100%
This translation is being used as source strings within this component.

Strings status

Strings Words Characters
995 20,989 127,780
All strings Browse Translate Zen
995 20,989 127,780
Read-only strings Browse Translate Zen

Summary

Project website risksacademy.com
Translation process
  • Translations can only be done through suggestions.
  • Suggestions are automatically accepted as translations once they have 3 votes.
  • Any authenticated user can contribute.
  • The translation uses monolingual files.
  • The translation base language can not be edited.

Reviews are disabled for this language. Review setting: Project settings.

Translations marked as needing editing are not written to the translation file.

Learn how to customize the workflow for this language.

Source code repository local:
Repository branch main
NXS Translate repository https://translate.risksacademy.com/git/academy-courses/course-cross-scale-options/
File mask *.json
Monolingual base language file en.json
Translation file Download en.json
Last change Nov. 6, 2026, 9:03 p.m.
Last change made by NXS Translate import
Language English
Language code en
Text direction Left to right
Case sensitivity Case-sensitive
Number of speakers 1,728,473,503
Number of plurals 2
Plural type One/other
Plurals Singular 1
Plural 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, …
Plural formula n != 1
11/06/2026

String statistics

Strings percent Hosted strings Words percent Hosted words Characters percent Hosted characters
Total 995 20,989 127,780
Translated 100% 995 100% 20,989 100% 127,780
Needs editing 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Read-only 100% 995 100% 20,989 100% 127,780
Failing checks 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Strings with suggestions 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Untranslated strings 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0
Last 12 months Previous

Activity in last 12 months

0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes 0 changes
NovDecJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Quick numbers

0
Hosted words
0
Hosted strings
0%
Translated
0
Contributors
and previous 30 days

Trends of last 30 days

—
Hosted words
—
—
Hosted strings
—
—
Translated
—
—
Contributors
—
nexus:import System

String added
Excellent (14 to 15): at least three option-created couplings with types and grades; an aggregation test computed correctly; grades per finding with inheritance applied; a limitations section that names the assumptions driving the lead and shows their effect; every number labelled; a first page that gives the decision, the lead, the alternative, the group most at risk and the grade. Good (11 to 13): clear and labelled with minor gaps. Developing (7 to 10): couplings listed without types or grades, or some numbers unlabelled. Insufficient (0 to 6): no Nexus lens, unlabelled numbers, personal data, or a package presented as advice or a decision.
Excellent (14 to 15): at least three option-created couplings with types and grades; an aggregation test computed correctly; grades per finding with inheritance applied; a limitations section that names the assumptions driving the lead and shows their effect; every number labelled; a first page that gives the decision, the lead, the alternative, the group most at risk and the grade. Good (11 to 13): clear and labelled with minor gaps. Developing (7 to 10): couplings listed without types or grades, or some numbers unlabelled. Insufficient (0 to 6): no Nexus lens, unlabelled numbers, personal data, or a package presented as advice or a decision.
excellent-14-to-15-at-least-three-option-created-fb323203cd
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Systems thinking, evidence grades, limitations and quality of writing
Systems thinking, evidence grades, limitations and quality of writing
systems-thinking-evidence-grades-limitations-and-e162df590e
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Excellent (14 to 15): an incidence table across groups, places, time and roles with burden ratios; groups that no portfolio helps identified; a dissent register with at least three entries, their grounds, what would change the view and the response, including any internal dissent; local or Indigenous knowledge used with provenance and consent noted where relevant. Good (11 to 13): sound treatment with one element thin. Developing (7 to 10): totals without burdens, or dissent summarised rather than recorded. Insufficient (0 to 6): no distributional analysis or dissent.
Excellent (14 to 15): an incidence table across groups, places, time and roles with burden ratios; groups that no portfolio helps identified; a dissent register with at least three entries, their grounds, what would change the view and the response, including any internal dissent; local or Indigenous knowledge used with provenance and consent noted where relevant. Good (11 to 13): sound treatment with one element thin. Developing (7 to 10): totals without burdens, or dissent summarised rather than recorded. Insufficient (0 to 6): no distributional analysis or dissent.
excellent-14-to-15-an-incidence-table-across-gro-663c870a8b
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Inclusion: distribution, dissent and plural knowledge
Inclusion: distribution, dissent and plural knowledge
inclusion-distribution-dissent-and-plural-knowle-795e2b78ae
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Excellent (14 to 15): a six-part residual risk statement with funded support and its arithmetic; roles for each option and stage; signposts and review dates; at least three downward notices to named kinds of entity, including any trigger roles. Good (11 to 13): sound arrangements with one element missing, such as a review signpost. Developing (7 to 10): support promised without funding, or notices without recipients. Insufficient (0 to 6): no residual risk statement or notices.
Excellent (14 to 15): a six-part residual risk statement with funded support and its arithmetic; roles for each option and stage; signposts and review dates; at least three downward notices to named kinds of entity, including any trigger roles. Good (11 to 13): sound arrangements with one element missing, such as a review signpost. Developing (7 to 10): support promised without funding, or notices without recipients. Insufficient (0 to 6): no residual risk statement or notices.
excellent-14-to-15-a-six-part-residual-risk-stat-33035dada5
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Executability: residual risk arrangements, roles and downward notices
Executability: residual risk arrangements, roles and downward notices
executability-residual-risk-arrangements-roles-a-e869adc131
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Excellent (18 to 20): dominated portfolios set aside correctly; a trade-off table in natural units with no single score; reversibility scored on cost, time and remaining consequences with authority noted; response-risk entries that say what is created, where it lands and who carries it; antagonism found and addressed. Good (14 to 17): sound treatment with one element thin, such as reversibility without remaining consequences. Developing (10 to 13): trade-offs collapsed into a score, or response risk listed without where it lands. Insufficient (0 to 9): no trade-offs, reversibility or response risk.
Excellent (18 to 20): dominated portfolios set aside correctly; a trade-off table in natural units with no single score; reversibility scored on cost, time and remaining consequences with authority noted; response-risk entries that say what is created, where it lands and who carries it; antagonism found and addressed. Good (14 to 17): sound treatment with one element thin, such as reversibility without remaining consequences. Developing (10 to 13): trade-offs collapsed into a score, or response risk listed without where it lands. Insufficient (0 to 9): no trade-offs, reversibility or response risk.
excellent-18-to-20-dominated-portfolios-set-asid-85172cfcd1
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Trade-offs, reversibility and response risk
Trade-offs, reversibility and response risk
trade-offs-reversibility-and-response-risk-d6c68a4bdc
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Excellent (18 to 20): a long list covering all five levels with a finding-to-option trace; the three reference options described in full, with an honest baseline; at least three portfolios tested across at least four scenarios on measures at more than one level; at least one interaction term computed correctly. Good (14 to 17): sound option space and appraisal with one element thin or a minor arithmetic error. Developing (10 to 13): options from one or two levels, reference options as blank rows, or fewer than four scenarios. Insufficient (0 to 9): a single option, or no appraisal across scenarios.
Excellent (18 to 20): a long list covering all five levels with a finding-to-option trace; the three reference options described in full, with an honest baseline; at least three portfolios tested across at least four scenarios on measures at more than one level; at least one interaction term computed correctly. Good (14 to 17): sound option space and appraisal with one element thin or a minor arithmetic error. Developing (10 to 13): options from one or two levels, reference options as blank rows, or fewer than four scenarios. Insufficient (0 to 9): a single option, or no appraisal across scenarios.
excellent-18-to-20-a-long-list-covering-all-five-6ff7ef9862
11/06/2026
nexus:import System

String added
Option space across five levels and appraisal across scenarios, with evidence
Option space across five levels and appraisal across scenarios, with evidence
option-space-across-five-levels-and-appraisal-ac-11e9b704bc
11/06/2026
Browse all translation changes